‘People are reading my work!’ – A Q&A with Emerald Open Research author Judith Nagasha

As one of the first authors to publish on Emerald Open Research we wanted to find out more about how Judith Irene Nagasha of Makerere University, Kampala Uganda found her publishing experience and what more she had to say about our new open access platform.

Judith’s article ‘Effect of climate variability on gender roles among communities surrounding Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda’ recently published in our Sustainable Food Systems gateway. You can read the article here.

Hi Judith, how did you hear about Emerald Open Research?

I first heard about Emerald Open Research through my Mentor -Professor Abdul Karim Bangura who is a renowned researcher with 5 PhDs in different fields.  Abdul contacted our network of African PhD students (College of Mentors- Codesria) and encouraged us to take a look at the platform and consider it for publishing our work.

How did you find your publishing experience on Emerald Open Research?

I found the Emerald Open Research process very smooth and the platform was easy to use. I was very impressed with the clarity of communications I received throughout my experience and the responsiveness to any questions I had along the way. As this was my first time using the platform it was reassuring to receive this guidance throughout the process.

What did you think about the open peer review process?

This was the first time I had experienced open peer review. I found the process very useful and learnt a lot from being able to do this. It was great to see feedback on my work and then have the opportunity to create a revised version to publish. As a research team we found the open peer review process easy to follow and we would be open to doing this again!

What value did you see in publishing your work on Emerald Open Research?

People are reading my work! It’s great to see that my research is being easily downloaded and accessible by not only my fellow researchers but academics across the world. Publishing my work on Emerald Open Research has also opened up new opportunities for me; I have already received over ten requests to review research within the field of Climate Change.

Did you face any challenges when publishing on Emerald Open Research?

I didn’t face any major challenges when publishing my work on Emerald Open Research. I thought that it would be difficult to source reviewers for my work that were not in my network however this worked out fine and I managed to source four great reviewers to review my research.

Would you choose to publish your work on Emerald Open Research again? (If so why)

I would publish my work again on Emerald Open Research and recommend the platform to my fellow researchers. I think it’s a great opportunity to increase the visibility of research and encourage researchers to submit impactful research.  I look forward to working with Emerald again in the future

You can visit Emerald Open Research and our six gateways aligned to the UN Sustainable Development goals here.

Article Details

Judith Irene Nagash

Date Published:

June 12th, 2019


Would you like to contribute to our Real Impact blog? Find out how.

Recent News & Blogs

- Discover impact news from across the globe

Keeping the door open

Shelley Allen - Open Research

As the new year dawned, the open access landscape was already in full discussion as cOAlition S requested feedback on their proposed framework for transformative journals. Here I explain our position on this framework and our aspirations for the future. At Emerald we are committed to providing a leading service for open research, in a

Read Article

The 1st issue of Real Impact is now live

Read the latest news and insights for the change-makers in the research community, who are passionate about making a difference and challenging the status quo.

Read Article

Stay In School campaign: Operationalising the extra medical measures to address the issue of fistula in Northern Nigeria

Dr. Bankole Allibay

Fistula and Extra-Medical Solution The orthodox response to gender-based sicknesses is scientific medical treatment. Although not incorrect, field experiences show that these treatments are often times reactive, and do not prevent a repeat incidence. Social performance practice recommends proactive social risk diagnosis and proactive risk management procedures, rather than reactive impact management. Such is the

Read Article

We use cookies to enhance your online experience. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to accept them in accordance with our cookie policy or you can .

Emerald Logo

Privacy and information

You can find further information about our privacy policy here.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookies should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings and ensure that the website works correctly, for example logging into the website.

If you disable these cookies, we will not be able to save your preferences and you may not be able to log in to the website. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

You can find further information about our cookie policy here.

Third Party Cookies

This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.

Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.

You can find further information about our cookie policy here.

Privacy and information

You can find further information about our privacy policy here.

To enjoy the full experience of our website please .